Clarify SeaweedFS uses existing UDS gateway configuration #45
No reviewers
Labels
No labels
app-migration
bug
ci-cd
cluster
Documentation
duplicate
enhancement
gpu
invalid
networking
question
security
Storage
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set
Reference
Homelab/Documentation!45
Loading…
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "kiyi/seaweed-native-routing"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Record the owner’s 2026-10-14 direction: SeaweedFS HTTPS is configuration on the existing UDS gateways, using existing certificates. Remove the standalone bundle/release-workflow/CI-identity prerequisite from the public storage record and separate TLS routing from later encryption, Terraform and migration work. Routing source merged in platform #121; live activation remains unverified.
Implementation cleanup: platform #122.
Validation: public diff reviewed for secrets; npm run check passes; production build passes with npm.cmd run build -- --webpack. The default local Turbopack build fails while starting its CSS worker, including outside the sandbox; no application/build configuration is changed by this documentation-only PR. Gitleaks staged hook passes.
Reviewed the two changed documentation files at
7d9482e03c. The SeaweedFS guidance consistently uses existing tenant/admin UDS gateways and certificates with Istio HTTPS termination and HTTP to TrueNAS, removes a standalone bundle/release workflow/CI identity as a prerequisite, and keeps live routing, authenticated S3, encryption, Terraform, backup/recovery, and AIStor consumer migration explicitly unverified/separate. No source-level blocking issue found. This is source review only; pending Documentation site and Source security checks remain required before merge. I have not independently verified the private platform routing or live activation.CI at submission: pending. This is a source-review approval, not a scan verdict; required checks still block merge.